Get a Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreement
A solid non compete contract and a practical non solicit agreement should do two things at once: protect your legitimate business interests and stay enforceable in the jurisdictions where your company operates. Core “legitimate interest and reasonableness” logic appears across common-law reasoning on restraints of trade, where courts weigh the protection of legitimate interests against hardship and public impact.
Who Needs a Non-Compete or Non-Solicit Agreement
Most helpful when your moat is relationships and know-how: software-as-a-service businesses, marketplaces, agencies, Web3 companies, fintech firms, and any business that relies on client lists, pricing, funnels, or product roadmaps, and where the team can move fast.
They are also common in deals where two businesses share access: joint ventures, platform integrations, investment prep, outsourcing, and long-term service delivery situations where the risk is not only “competition,” but also “raiding.”
.png)
What Types of Non-Compete Agreements We Draft
A restrictive covenant agreement is only as strong as its fit: role-by-role realities, competitive market boundaries, and the governing-law rules that decide whether a court (or arbitrator) would uphold it. General covenant not to compete principles describe restraints on competition as enforceable only when they are ancillary to a valid relationship and not greater than needed to protect legitimate interests.
Business Non Compete Agreement
Business Non Compete Agreement form is common in buying/selling a business, transferring goodwill, or restructuring ownership where the buyer is paying for market position and customer relationships. The Restatement specifically recognizes sale‑of‑business non‑competition promises as a typical “ancillary restraint” that can be reasonable when calibrated to protect what was purchased.
What Types of Non-Solicitation Agreements We Draft
A non-solicitation clause is usually more limited than a non-compete: while non-competes prevent working in an industry, non-solicitations stop contact with certain individuals (customers, clients, and employees) for a period of time. This wording has a narrower scope than a non-compete clause, and Icon.Partners can help you draft a document that truly protects your interests.
Employee Non Solicitation Agreement
An employee non solicitation agreement focuses on non solicitation of employees—preventing “team lift-outs,” recruiter-driven raids, or managers pulling whole squads into a new venture. Some regulators treat “no-poach” style conduct as a serious competition concern, which is why the clause must be drafted as a legitimate protective measure. This is also where the phrase non recruitment clause often appears in practice: it is essentially a no‑hire/no‑recruit promise for a defined group and time.
What a Non-Compete and Non-Solicit Agreement Protects
In practice, a combined package tends to protect:
confidential business information and operational know‑how shared during employment or contracting;
customer relationships and goodwill (especially in sales, account management, and founder-led growth);
team stability (preventing coordinated hiring away of employees);
partnership boundaries when companies collaborate and exchange access.
.png)
What Clauses Must Be Included in the Agreement
In general: definitions, scope, duration, geography, enforcement, and how the clause interacts with local law.
Non Compete Clause and Scope of Restrictions
The non compete clause should define:
what counts as “competitive activity,”
which markets/products/services are covered, and
which roles are restricted so the scope can be defended as “no broader than needed.”
This is where jurisdiction can be decisive.
Non Solicitation Clause for Employees and Clients
A non solicitation clause must define “solicit” (direct vs indirect), identify protected groups (employees, customers, leads), and limit the restriction to relationships actually worth protecting. Where statutory definitions exist, aligning language to them can prevent a clause from being recharacterized into a stricter category.
Duration and Geographic Restrictions
Time and geography are classic enforceability pressure points. Under restraint-of-trade logic, “reasonable” limits depend on facts—what you need to protect, how quickly information becomes stale, and how narrowly you can draw the restricted area to match real business reach.
Penalties and Enforcement Terms
Enforcement language often covers remedies (injunctions, damages, fee shifting), notice duties, and dispute-resolution mechanics. It also must reflect local statutory risk.
Non-Compete vs Non-Solicitation Agreement
Non competition agreements are broader in nature, as they prohibit employment in, or the creation of, a competitive firm. Non solicitation agreements are narrower and mainly cover people that could be approached (such as clients, customers, employees) post termination.
This is among other reasons why most firms choose to build up their restrictive covenant strategy from a solid non-solicit base (along with confidentiality and IP protection), and use non-competition agreements when truly warranted.
Template or Custom Legal Drafting
A template cannot know: your actual competitive set, how your team works (employee vs contractor), where people are located, and which jurisdiction will govern disputes. State-by-state tracking shows high variability even within a single country, which makes “one template for everyone” structurally unsafe for distributed hiring.
Risks of Using Standard Non Compete Agreements
The risk is not only “unenforceable.” It can be unlawful to include or attempt to enforce a non compete clause in certain jurisdictions. California law, for example, frames noncompetes as broadly void in employment and makes it unlawful to include non compete clauses outside narrow exceptions, with notice obligations and unfair‑competition consequences.
If you operate across multiple states/countries, a generic noncompete form can create compliance exposure precisely where you are hiring the most.
Our Agreement Drafting Process
At Icon.Partners, we structure our work on restrictive covenants around two key principles: robust contract design and a systematic approach to legal processes. For us, this means not only high-quality drafting, but also effective project management, rapid onboarding, and deep integration with the client’s business teams.
Our approach includes:
analyzing business risks (such as clients, know-how, and team structure) and selecting the most appropriate form of restriction: non-compete, non-solicitation, confidentiality, IP protection, or a combination of these;
selecting the applicable law and taking local restrictions into account, especially for distributed and remote teams;
formulating definitions and scopes of obligations so that they align with actual operational processes (roles, competitors, client categories);
verifying enforceability and analysing areas of illegality risk (e.g., non-compete restrictions in California);
supporting negotiations and implementation to ensure that the documents not only exist but actually work in the business.
At Icon.Partners, we offer flexible collaboration models: Fixed Price for individual tasks, a subscription for ongoing support, and Pay-as-you-go for quick inquiries. This allows you to scale your legal function alongside your business.
When working with restrictive covenants, we immediately establish a realistic timeline. It depends on the number of jurisdictions, team structure, the need for B2B/mutual restrictions, and the complexity of negotiations.
Our focus is on a fast, predictable process and a result that actually works in business.
Cost and Timeline for Agreement Preparation
Why Businesses Choose Our NDA Drafting Services
Beyond drafting, contract review is often where the biggest savings happen: catching non‑enforceable language, narrowing an overbroad restriction, or identifying a clause that triggers statutory notice/penalty exposure. Icon.Partners markets contract drafting and counterparties’ contract risk review as part of its contracts service line.
Why Businesses Choose Our Legal Services
At Icon.Partners, we are an international, tech-focused team that supports IT and online businesses around the world. Over the past 10+ years, we have helped 350+ clients and earned Top Rated status on Upwork.
We support projects in more than 40 jurisdictions, which is particularly critical for contracts that need to operate cross-border.
Restrictive covenants are not a niche request for us. As part of our Contracts & Agreements practice, we regularly work with non-compete and non-solicit agreements as standard tools for protecting businesses.
5.0
"Their adept use of technology for communication and project management streamlined the entire process."
Thanks to Icon.Partners' efforts, the client was able to integrate with major platforms, such as Google, Facebook, and Stripe, and optimize their platform. The team was highly supportive and responsive from a workflow standpoint, and internal stakeholders were particularly impressed with the service provider's flexibility, professionalism, and technical prowess.
Oleksandr Platonov
CEO, VorfahrQR UG
Germany📍
Apr 10, 2024
5.0
"They have a modern and technological approach to doing business."
The client is satisfied with Icon.Partners' work, whose documentation is a vital part of their success. The client resolves legal and financial issues with the help of the team. Their excellent communication skills, timely delivery, modern approach, and diverse expertise make them a great partner.
Anton Tkachov
CEO of Gotoinc LTD
Cyprus📍
Jan 18, 2024
Reviews
5.0
"Their adept use of technology for communication and project management streamlined the entire process."
Thanks to Icon.Partners' efforts, the client was able to integrate with major platforms, such as Google, Facebook, and Stripe, and optimize their platform. The team was highly supportive and responsive from a workflow standpoint, and internal stakeholders were particularly impressed with the service provider's flexibility, professionalism, and technical prowess.
Oleksandr Platonov
CEO, VorfahrQR UG
Germany📍
Apr 10, 2024
Reviews
